mardi 12 mars 2013

Marine Le Pen pourfend l’islamisme

MLP
Michel Garroté, réd en chef –- Marine Le Pen, présidente du Front national, estime ce lundi que la société française recule face aux demandes du fondamentalisme islamique, citant un refus, par des ONG, de dons alimentaires contenant du porc (extraits adaptés ; cf. lien vers source en bas de page). Sur i>Télé, l’eurodéputée juge que le « risque terroriste n’est pas sous contrôle tant que tous ces intégristes ne sont pas en prison ou expulsés ». Loin d’incarner la fermeté, le ministre de l’Intérieur Manuel Valls fait « comme Sarkozy : quand les lumières se braquent, on en expulse un ou deux. Mais je ne suis pas sûre qu’il y ait une vision et un plan global pour maîtriser le fondamentalisme islamique », ajoute-t-elle.
La société française recule, les dirigeants français reculent face aux réclamations de ce fondamentalisme. « Lorsque l’on voit que notre compagnie Air France n’a plus de porc dans ses plateaux repas, que les cantines scolaires de plus en plus ne présentent pas de porc dans les repas, que les cantines de l’administration font de même, que des associations humanitaires comme Restaurants du cœur et Secours catholique refusent les dons de produits qui contiennent du porc, est-ce que là, on ne se soumet pas aux revendications des plus extrémistes ? », demande Marine Le Pen.
« Ça veut dire que les Français non croyants, les musulmans qui ne sont pas intégristes ou les catholiques – car notre pays a des racines catholiques, il faut quand même le rappeler -, ces millions de gens-là doivent se soumettre au diktat de quelques-uns qui ne supportent pas qu’on puisse avoir du jambon dans une cantine ? », s’insurge Marine Le Pen. « On vit où, là ? On n’est pas en Arabie saoudite, on n’est pas au Qatar », proteste-t-elle. « L’intégrisme islamique, il ne pousse pas dans les champs en Bretagne », répond-elle à une question sur les liens qu’elle a établis entre terrorisme et immigration (fin des extraits adaptés ; cf. ci-dessous lien vers source).
 

Le Pen pourfend et à l’inverse Virgin Airways se couche devant les muzz et qui plus est humilie une militaire britannique, à diffuser largement !

Virgin Atlantic Airways orders Royal Navy Petty Officer to change out of her uniform before boarding because it could be ‘offensive’ to some passengers

imagesWhich passengers, al-Qaeda? Virgin Atlantic told 32-year-old helicopter technician Nicky Howse that it was company policy not to allow military personnel to travel in uniform because it is considered “offensive” to some.

UK Daily Mail For 15 years she has proudly served her country as a Royal Navy engineer, risking her life in Afghanistan when she fought against the Taliban. But far from showing Nicky Howse the respect she deserved as she flew back to her latest posting, Virgin Atlantic staff chose to humiliate her – by demanding that she remove her uniform.

article-2290462-187A2025000005DC-560_634x545

Petty Officer Howse is on a three-month deployment with a helicopter unit in the US, but had been home on compassionate leave to attend her grandfather’s funeral. She had worn her uniform without any problems on a Virgin flight from America to Britain the week before. The incident happened as she waited for her return flight to Los Angeles from Heathrow on Monday.

She was confronted by a G4S security guard and Virgin Atlantic staff, who ordered her to change into pyjamas before boarding the jet. They told her – wrongly – that it was the company’s policy not to allow military personnel to travel in uniform.

In emails sent to a civilian friend, Petty Officer Howse, from Ipswich, Suffolk, said: ‘It was horrific. I was made to feel uncomfortable in my own country for wearing the uniform I wear to defend the place. It made me ashamed of my country that a British serviceman can’t travel in uniform. I was so distressed.’ She told her friend: ‘It started at check-in. Some G4S security guy gave me the third degree about travelling in uniform. I was fuming. He was rude, he wouldn’t let the check-in girl give me my passport.

Royal-Navy-engineer-told-to-remove-uniform-on-Virgin-flight

‘I was shaking with rage. I thought it was all done. But when I got to the departure gate I was taken to the side by the flight supervisor and they said I wasn’t allowed to fly in uniform and had to wear a sleep suit. I then stood feeling completely humiliated with other passengers, clearly curious as to what was going on, staring at me, waiting for him to come back with the black pyjamas.

‘I asked if it was Virgin policy, they said “Yes”. I refused to wear it until after I was on board then still refused but basically got told I’d be asked to leave the flight if I didn’t take it off or cover it up.’ She told her friend: ‘I was basically told it was because “We don’t only fly British passengers” and told it was seen as a threat. I went ballistic. I said “In the country I defend I can’t wear my uniform?”

‘They then said it was for my own safety to stop abuse to which I replied I can deal with that myself if it arises as I did in Afghanistan. ‘Honestly, I was gobsmacked and horrified. I was so distressed, particularly since the whole reason I was travelling was for a funeral.

‘To clarify, a British airline who claims to be Britain’s flag carrier won’t allow a member of Britain’s armed forces to travel on their airline in uniform.’ Armed Forces rules state that a serviceman or woman can wear their uniforms voluntarily from their ‘residence to place of duty, irrespective of whether they travel by public or private transport, or on foot.’

Colonel Richard Kemp, who led British forces in Afghanistan, said: ‘This is an insult to the Royal Navy and to the British armed forces who the Queen’s uniform represents. ‘This naval engineer has volunteered to serve and to fight for her country. How dare Virgin Atlantic and G4S treat her like dirt?’

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former infantry officer, said: ‘Our soldiers, sailors and airmen risk their lives so that firms like Virgin Atlantic can operate and make money. ‘It is nothing short of disgraceful that they don’t receive the proper respect due to their uniform.’

article-2290462-188703FF000005DC-519_634x601
 

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire